« the best of the badass bible | Main | an evening with unruly children »
andrew is asking the question. does emerging or emergent church still fit? some people say it doesn't and the criticism and resources don't fit.. the non-defining of the church doesn't help either.. what are your thoughts? does the terminology still work for you?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c057553ef00e54f9143a18833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference does "emergent" still fit:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I don't hear the term near as much as I did several months ago. Does that mean anything?
Posted by: Greg Hazelrig | December 01, 2007 at 03:13 PM
i think it does mean something.. probably that it will manifest itself in certain congregations make up. and it will stop being the next big thing. but i don't see it going anywhere. might morph names. missional could be the final naming
Posted by: gavin | December 02, 2007 at 12:44 AM